From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:38:20 -0300
Message-ID: <20110315033820.GA16259@amt.cnet>
References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain>
 <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com>
 <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com>
 <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com>
 <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com>
 <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35066 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750913Ab1CODq4 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:46:56 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:21:07PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>  The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
> >>>  regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
> >>
> >> Can't follow. What do you mean?
> > 
> > I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test 
> > definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. 
> >   What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.
> 
> Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else?
> 
> Jan

The failing Fedora installation problem is gone.