From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM: x86: vcpu state writeback should be aware of REQ_NMI
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:12:49 -0300
Message-ID: <20110329131249.GA2675@amt.cnet>
References: <20110324124700.GA26882@amt.cnet>
 <20110324132716.GA13195@redhat.com>
 <20110324145910.GB26882@amt.cnet>
 <20110324151935.GB14544@redhat.com>
 <4D8B64BF.6050900@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11128 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751834Ab1C2Nac (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:30:32 -0400
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TDUW5n015578
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:30:32 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D8B64BF.6050900@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 05:35:27PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/24/2011 05:19 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>  Two patches one to revert REQ_NMI then another to fix the original problem
> >>  makes backporting easier.
> >If we agree this is the way to go will do that.
> >
> 
> Not sure, want to think about it for a bit.

Ping?