From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: KVM: x86: better fix for race between nmi injection and enabling nmi window Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:43:05 -0300 Message-ID: <20110330164305.GA27589@amt.cnet> References: <20110330163028.GA27365@amt.cnet> <20110330163322.GE7766@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm , Avi Kivity To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34472 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755272Ab1C3RBD (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:01:03 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2UH12ps019244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:01:02 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110330163322.GE7766@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:30:28PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > Based on Gleb's idea, fix race between nmi injection and enabling > > nmi window in a simpler way. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti > > > But we need to revert the patch that introduced use of request for NMI > first. Otherwise NMI will not be delivered, no? Yes, pushed, can you verify please?