public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM: x86: better fix for race between nmi injection and enabling nmi window
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:47:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110330184703.GC7741@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D936572.3060801@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:16:34PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 06:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >Based on Gleb's idea, fix race between nmi injection and enabling
> >nmi window in a simpler way.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@redhat.com>
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >index a6a129f..9a7cc1be 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> >@@ -5152,6 +5152,7 @@ static void kvm_put_guest_xcr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> >  	int r;
> >+	int nmi_pending;
> >  	bool req_int_win = !irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)&&
> >  		vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window;
> >
> >@@ -5195,11 +5196,13 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  	if (unlikely(r))
> >  		goto out;
> >
> >+	nmi_pending = ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->arch.nmi_pending);
> >+
> >  	if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu) || req_int_win) {
> >  		inject_pending_event(vcpu);
> >
> >  		/* enable NMI/IRQ window open exits if needed */
> >-		if (vcpu->arch.nmi_pending)
> >+		if (nmi_pending)
> >  			kvm_x86_ops->enable_nmi_window(vcpu);
> >  		else if (kvm_cpu_has_interrupt(vcpu) || req_int_win)
> >  			kvm_x86_ops->enable_irq_window(vcpu);
> >
> 
> What about the check in inject_pending_events()?
> 
Didn't we decide that this check is not a problem? Worst that can happen
is NMI injection will be delayed till next exit.

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30 16:30 KVM: x86: better fix for race between nmi injection and enabling nmi window Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-30 16:33 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-03-30 16:43   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-30 17:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-30 18:47   ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2011-03-31  9:23     ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-31  9:24       ` Gleb Natapov
2011-03-31  9:25         ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-31  9:40           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-31  9:47           ` Gleb Natapov
2011-03-31  9:30     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-04-01 14:26 ` KVM: x86: better fix for race between nmi injection and enabling nmi window (v2) Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110330184703.GC7741@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox