From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:31:58 +0200
Message-ID: <20110404103158.GA4300@elte.hu>
References: <1301592656.586.15.camel@jaguar>
 <4D978930.1000909@codemonkey.ws>
 <20110403062117.GA27121@elte.hu>
 <4D982EB8.7080001@redhat.com>
 <BANLkTikkyktU3KL8h71PYLF_ds0C07QKcg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikkyktU3KL8h71PYLF_ds0C07QKcg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org


* Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> wrote:

> > Well, this is bound to cause confusion as the tool is yet quite immature.
> 
> Yes, that's really unfortunate. I don't care too much what we call the tool 
> but I definitely agree with Ingo that 'kvm' is more discoverable to users. 
> Any suggestions?

Well, lets keep it 'kvm' - if it stays immature it doesnt matter much. If it 
improves it has the right and obvious tool name.

Thanks,

	Ingo