From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:36:35 +0300 Message-ID: <20110406093635.GE25626@redhat.com> References: <1301592656.586.15.camel@jaguar> <4D982E89.8070502@redhat.com> <4D9847BC.9060906@redhat.com> <4D98716D.9040307@codemonkey.ws> <4D9873CD.3080207@redhat.com> <20110406093333.GB6465@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110406093333.GB6465@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:33:33AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > So no, your kind of cynical, defeatist sentiment about code quality is by no > means true in my experience. Projects become ugly gooballs once maintainers > stop caring enough. > In case of Qemu it was other way around. Maintainers started caring to late. -- Gleb.