From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:39:32 -0400
Message-ID: <20110408143932.GA21044@thunk.org>
References: <4D9847BC.9060906@redhat.com>
 <4D98716D.9040307@codemonkey.ws>
 <4D9873CD.3080207@redhat.com>
 <20110406093333.GB6465@elte.hu>
 <4D9E6F6E.9050709@codemonkey.ws>
 <BANLkTimEwAuL4PM9vBfogkrua-Z44AZQvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D9EBBC3.2040803@siemens.com>
 <1302251236.27918.31.camel@jaguar>
 <4D9ED146.7040004@siemens.com>
 <BANLkTimuicK-7Og8V+W1Oz6MqL3sa13H4A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"aarcange@redhat.com" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"asias.hejun@gmail.com" <asias.hejun@gmail.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimuicK-7Og8V+W1Oz6MqL3sa13H4A@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:32:24PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> 
> It seems there is a misunderstanding. KVM-tool is quite far from been KVM
> replacement (if ever). And what we're doing -- extremely tiny/small HV which
> would help us to debug/test kernel code.

If that's true, then perhaps the command-line invocation shouldn't be
named "kvm"?  The collision on the name of executable that claims that
it will replace the kvm shipped in qemu seems to make the claim quite
clearly that it's going to replace qemu's kvm in short order?

	     	  	   	   	      	 - Ted