From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: MMU: Optimize guest page table walk Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 08:20:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20110419062020.GE8155@8bytes.org> References: <20110419033220.e527bcae.takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com> <20110419033814.3cc7ab5e.takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com> <20110418185203.GC8155@8bytes.org> <20110419102410.57f173b2.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa , avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Takuya Yoshikawa Return-path: Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:47367 "EHLO 8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751393Ab1DSGUV (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 02:20:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110419102410.57f173b2.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:24:10AM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > Can I test nested SVM easily, e.g.? Yes, nested SVM would be good to test too with those changes. We should make sure to not break something there. Regards, Joerg