From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
prasadjoshi124@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kvm tools: Add debug feature to test the IO thread
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:11:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110419171116.GD6640@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303232667.6697.5.camel@stimpy>
* Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 19:52 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Add --debug-io-delay-cycles and --debug-io-delay-amount to delay the completion of IO requests within virtio-blk.
> > > This feature allows to verify and debug the threading within virtio-blk.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> >
> > Well, to be honest, I'm not convinced we need both of these. Isn't
> > --debug-io-delay=<msec> enough for our use?
>
> This came up during our testing.
>
> Ingo suggested a large delay so we could easily see the results of
> threading. The problem we encountered was that having a delay right from
> the beginning will make the guest kernel take a rather long time to boot
> and would make actually testing the threading impossible.
>
> I've added a delay before the activation of the I/O request completion
> delay to give the tester/debugger enough time to boot into the guest and
> prepare anything needed for the test.
>
> Making it a constant is also rather hard because different kernels can
> take a very different amount of I/O requests to boot. Take the simple
> example of a whether fsck was running during the boot or not.
I suspect we'll eventually want to have some sort of 'kvm set' subcommand that
can modify attributes of running instances? Setting the debug delay would be
one of the options:
kvm set MyInstance-1 --debug-io-delay-ms 10000
That way the delay can be activated in a suitable moment - and disabled again
after testing:
kvm set MyInstance-1 --debug-io-delay-ms 0
?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-19 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 13:02 [PATCH 1/4] kvm tools: Thread virtio-blk Sasha Levin
2011-04-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm tools: Use virtio_blk_parameters to configure virtio-blk Sasha Levin
2011-04-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm tools: Add debug feature to test the IO thread Sasha Levin
2011-04-19 16:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-19 17:04 ` Sasha Levin
2011-04-19 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-04-19 23:10 ` Asias He
2011-04-20 5:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-20 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm tools: Complete missing segments in a iov op using regular op Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110419171116.GD6640@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox