From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] qemu-kvm: Move gsi bits from kvm_msix_vector_add to kvm_msi_add_message
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:36:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110427133600.GI15788@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB81A2B.9020603@siemens.com>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 03:29:15PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-04-27 14:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:23:38PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >>
> >> Testing support and allocating a GSI for an MSI message is required both
> >> for MSI and MSI-X. At this chance, drop the aging version warning.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >
> > No objection, but I do note that this means running on an old
> > kernel will lead to a silent failure.
>
> Shouldn't be silent: The caller of msi_vector_use should check and
> process the error (virtio should even forward it to guest IIUC).
It does, but the msi/msix spec does not allow this so not
all guest OSes can use this extended reporting.
> > stderr output is not in fact much better: I think we should
> > check the capability in msix_init. Care coding this up?
>
> I think the motivation to check on vector activation is that devices and
> guests without a need for MSI should not cause a failure if MSI is
> unsupported by KVM.
>
> Jan
IMO it's better not to report MSI capability in this setup.
> --
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-23 10:23 [PATCH 0/7] qemu-kvm: Clean up and enhance MSI irqchip support Jan Kiszka
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] qemu-kvm: Drop unneeded kvm_irq_routing_entry declaration Jan Kiszka
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] qemu-kvm: Rename kvm_msix_message to KVMMsiMessage Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 13:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-27 14:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 14:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-27 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 14:40 ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-27 14:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 14:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-27 14:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] qemu-kvm: Refactor MSI core API of KVM Jan Kiszka
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] qemu-kvm: Fix and clean up msix vector use/unuse hooks Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 12:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] qemu-kvm: Move gsi bits from kvm_msix_vector_add to kvm_msi_add_message Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-27 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] qemu-kvm: Move entry comparison into kvm_msi_update_message Jan Kiszka
2011-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] qemu-kvm: Add in-kernel irqchip support for MSI Jan Kiszka
2011-04-27 13:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-04-27 14:44 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110427133600.GI15788@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox