From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: State of stable 2.6.38 queue
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 19:09:33 -0300
Message-ID: <20110501220932.GA12838@amt.cnet>
References: <4DBBEDEB.1000000@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50808 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752310Ab1EAWKI (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 1 May 2011 18:10:08 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DBBEDEB.1000000@web.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 01:09:31PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as I was about to update kvm-kmod-2.6.38, I checked for KVM changes
> since 2.6.38-rc7 which kvm-kmod is currently based on - none. That
> surprised as the update queue is non-empty. Was something lost on the
> way to stable, or are they on hold intentionally?
> 
> Jan

The queue will be sent this week.