From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi124@gmail.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm tools: Respect ISR status in virtio header
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 16:00:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110507140030.GA2859@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DC529E8.8030104@gmail.com>
* Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> BTW. The ping latency was caused by the movement of irq injection outside the
> loop. Suppose we have 5 available buffers and only 1 buffer from tap device.
> We will sleep on read without giving the buffer from tap to guest. The
> latency will be huge in this case.
>
> while(virt_queue__available(vq)) {
> ...
> read(tap_fd)
> ...
> }
> trigger_irq()
But ... in one of the mails one of you claimed that even when moving the irq
notification inside the loop (which we all agreed was necessary to avoid
latencies!) the latencies would still occur during stress-tests.
So something is still not understood here and could hit us anytime with any of
the virtio drivers in the future and such bugs are not always so nice to debug
like the latency problem here ...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-07 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-07 2:34 [PATCH 1/2] kvm tools: Respect ISR status in virtio header Asias He
2011-05-07 2:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm tools: Respect VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT Asias He
2011-05-07 7:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-07 9:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-07 11:25 ` Asias He
2011-05-07 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm tools: Respect ISR status in virtio header Ingo Molnar
2011-05-07 10:34 ` Sasha Levin
2011-05-07 10:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-07 10:39 ` Asias He
2011-05-07 11:15 ` Asias He
2011-05-07 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-07 14:24 ` Asias He
2011-05-07 13:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-07 14:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-07 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-07 14:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-07 14:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-07 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-07 14:50 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-07 15:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-05-07 15:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-07 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110507140030.GA2859@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox