From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: KVM: x86: use proper port value when checking io instruction permission (v2) Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:29:07 +0300 Message-ID: <20110526092907.GI29458@redhat.com> References: <4DDDF3D6.3000505@redhat.com> <20110526065511.GA29458@redhat.com> <4DDDFB07.2050909@redhat.com> <4DDDFB78.9070307@redhat.com> <20110526070737.GB29458@redhat.com> <4DDE0601.8060008@redhat.com> <20110526082639.GE29458@redhat.com> <4DDE16A8.40108@redhat.com> <20110526090230.GH29458@redhat.com> <4DDE1C20.1020103@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm , Joerg Roedel To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27827 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754177Ab1EZJ3K (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 05:29:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DDE1C20.1020103@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:23:44AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 05/26/2011 11:02 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >We can make it honor ByteOp. There will be no instruction that will > >specify DstDX | ByteOp though. > > "in %dx, %al" and "out %al, %dx" will via D2bv. > Yeah. Should ignore ByteOp then. -- Gleb.