From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
john@jfloren.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com,
gorcunov@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm tools: Add ioeventfd support
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:38:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110527113855.GE25909@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin9KbuLAnjE6PFoKH78Ny3-3tK1Qw@mail.gmail.com>
* Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > A sidenote: i think 'struct kvm *kvm' was a naming mistake - it's way
> > too aspecific, it tells us nothing. What is a 'kvm'?
>
> Why, an instance of a kernel virtual machine, of course! It was the
> very first thing I wrote for this project!
Oh, that is way too funny: i never thought of 'KVM' as a 'kernel
virtual machine' :-/ It's the name of a cool kernel subsystem - not
the name of one instance of a virtual machine.
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > A much better name would be 'struct machine *machine', hm? Even if
> > everyone agrees this would be a separate patch, obviously.
>
> Well, I don't really think 'struct machine' is that much better. The
> obvious benefits of 'struct kvm' is that it's the same name that's
> used by Qemu and libkvm and maps nicely to '/dev/kvm'.
To me /dev/kvm is what interfaces to 'KVM' - where 'KVM' is the
magic, axiomatic name for the aforementioned cool kernel subsystem! :-)
> If you really, really wanna change it, I could use some more
> convincing or bribes of some sort.
No, i guess the naming is just fine, i just need to rewire 5 years
worth of neural pathways ;-)
I'll save the bribes for a worthier goal! :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-27 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-27 10:36 [PATCH 1/4] kvm tools: Add ioeventfd support Sasha Levin
2011-05-27 10:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm tools: Use ioeventfd in virtio-blk Sasha Levin
2011-05-27 10:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm tools: Use ioeventfd in virtio-net Sasha Levin
2011-05-27 10:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm tools: Use ioeventfd in virtio-rng Sasha Levin
2011-05-27 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] kvm tools: Add ioeventfd support Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-05-27 10:57 ` Sasha Levin
2011-05-27 10:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-27 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 11:02 ` Sasha Levin
2011-05-27 11:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 11:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-27 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110527113855.GE25909@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=john@jfloren.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox