From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Yang, Wei Y" <wei.y.yang@intel.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 1/4] Remove SMEP bit from CR4_RESERVED_BITS
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 09:40:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530074033.GB27557@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5D8008F58939784290FAB48F5497519844E92781DF@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
* Yang, Wei Y <wei.y.yang@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch removes SMEP bit from CR4_RESERVED_BITS.
I'm wondering, what is the best-practice way for tools/kvm/ to set
SMEP for the guest kernel automatically, even if the guest kernel
itsef has not requested SMEP?
The portion i'm worried about are old KVM versions that have the SMEP
bit in CR4_RESERVED_BITS and reject it. So we cannot just
unilaterally add SMEP to every cr4 write of the guest. Is there a way
to query whether the host KVM version supports SMEP setting in cr4?
That way tools/kvm/ could add the SMEP bit if the host CPU has it in
/proc/cpuinfo and if KVM supports it.
( With a --no-smep kind of command line option to opt out of this
automatic protection, to test it, and for the unlikely case that
SMEP causes problems. )
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-30 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 3:01 [Patch v5 1/4] Remove SMEP bit from CR4_RESERVED_BITS Yang, Wei Y
2011-05-30 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-30 7:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 8:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-30 8:43 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-30 8:53 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-30 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-30 9:00 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-01 7:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2011-06-01 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-01 7:55 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110530074033.GB27557@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=wei.y.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox