From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Fix build warnings Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:26:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20110531102655.GC24172@elte.hu> References: <20110530124600.GB494@eferding.osrc.amd.com> <1306786278-12219-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20110531073824.GA17999@elte.hu> <4DE4A4E7.80503@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Borislav Petkov , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Takuya Yoshikawa To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:34737 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752302Ab1EaK1L (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 06:27:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DE4A4E7.80503@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/31/2011 10:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >* Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h > >> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker, > >> gva_t addr, u32 access) > >> { > >> pt_element_t pte; > >> - pt_element_t __user *ptep_user; > >> + pt_element_t __user *uninitialized_var(ptep_user); > > > >Note that doing this is actually actively dangerous for two reasons. > > > > > > > > > Please fix it instead. > > s/instead/in addition/; while all those changes are good, they are > much too large for 3.0. Let's push the simple fix for 3.0 and > queue the bigger refactoring to 3.1. Yeah, that's probably wise, this is a tricky function. Thanks, Ingo