From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] kvm tools: Add rwlock wrapper Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20110603073427.GF15375@elte.hu> References: <20110530095451.GB8461@elte.hu> <20110530201110.f3bf20b5.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <1306753954.14564.92.camel@lappy> <20110530202646.eff0ea28.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4DE381DB.8040804@redhat.com> <20110530114949.GD22324@elte.hu> <4DE387DA.3020307@redhat.com> <20110530123602.GK22324@elte.hu> <1307086079.13088.8.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Takuya Yoshikawa , Pekka Enberg , kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com, "Paul E. McKenney" , takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com To: Sasha Levin , Yinghai Lu Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:57915 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752599Ab1FCHel (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 03:34:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1307086079.13088.8.camel@lappy> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Sasha Levin wrote: > > with no apparent progress being made. > > Since it's something that worked in 2.6.37, I've looked into it to > find what might have caused this issue. > > I've bisected guest kernels and found that the problem starts with: > > a26ac2455ffcf3be5c6ef92bc6df7182700f2114 is the first bad commit > commit a26ac2455ffcf3be5c6ef92bc6df7182700f2114 > Author: Paul E. McKenney > Date: Wed Jan 12 14:10:23 2011 -0800 > > rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread > > Ingo, could you confirm that the problem goes away for you when you > use an earlier commit? testing will have to wait, but there's a recent upstream fix: d72bce0e67e8: rcu: Cure load woes That *might* perhaps address this problem too. If not then this appears to be some sort of RCU related livelock with brutally overcommitted vcpus. On native this would show up too, in a less drastic form, as a spurious bootup delay. Thanks, Ingo