From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kvm tools, ui: Add support for SDL framebuffer output target Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:52:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20110603165225.GA18795@elte.hu> References: <1307116779-572-1-git-send-email-penberg@kernel.org> <1307116779-572-3-git-send-email-penberg@kernel.org> <20110603162631.GA17203@elte.hu> <20110603162856.GA17415@elte.hu> <20110603163346.GB17415@elte.hu> <20110603164500.GB17964@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Cyrill Gorcunov , John Floren , Sasha Levin To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:55493 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752311Ab1FCQwg (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:52:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >Oh ... because the SDL library is not present on that box and it > >silently did not get built. > > > >Now *that* is not an obvious failure pattern ;-) > > Oh, sorry about that. I'll just drop the '--sdl' command line option > if the library is not present. Does that sound OK to you? it would be better to display a meaningful error message in that case and not run, the user very likely has added --sdl expecting a framebuffer to pop up! Thanks, Ingo