From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] kvm tools: Add rwlock wrapper Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:22:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20110615042257.GB2299@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110603202211.GP2333@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1307135039.2811.6.camel@lappy> <20110603212028.GS2333@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1307141685.2867.2.camel@lappy> <20110603230510.GU2333@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1307168775.27498.2.camel@lappy> <20110604163052.GC6093@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1308090361.3215.5.camel@lappy> <20110614234226.GR2288@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1308101122.3215.6.camel@lappy> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , Yinghai Lu , Avi Kivity , Takuya Yoshikawa , Pekka Enberg , kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com, takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com To: Sasha Levin Return-path: Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:54998 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750793Ab1FOEXP (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:23:15 -0400 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5F3wpfS029061 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:58:51 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p5F4Mx2q461792 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:22:59 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p5F4MwEZ001868 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:22:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1308101122.3215.6.camel@lappy> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:25:22PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 16:42 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 06:26:01PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay on this. > > > > Actually, you might have had excellent timing on this one. > > > > Could you please try Shaohua Li's patch at: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/14/20 > > > > This patch makes RCU much less prone to causing massive scheduler lock > > contention, which might well be the cause of the problems that you > > are seeing. > > This patch has solved the hang issue I've had. kvm tools now boots 60 > vcpus easily with 3.0 kernel. Thank you, Sasha -- I have added your Tested-by. Thanx, Paul