From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool v2 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:57:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20110616095712.GA10989@elte.hu> References: <4DF92C80.3030106@codemonkey.ws> <7A30A509-47AA-4E72-ABF3-937005900F9D@suse.de> <4DF93010.1040006@codemonkey.ws> <4DF935C1.4020000@codemonkey.ws> <20110616092429.GA5484@infradead.org> <20110616094810.GA19965@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pekka Enberg , Anthony Liguori , Alexander Graf , Prasad Joshi , Avi Kivity , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Sasha Levin , Cyrill Gorcunov , Asias He , Jens Axboe To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110616094810.GA19965@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > What's the right thing to do here? Is fdatasync() sufficient? > > Yes. Prasad, Pekka, mind redoing the numbers with fdatasync()? I'd be surprised if they were significantly worse but it has to be done to have apples-to-apples numbers. Thanks, Ingo