From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool v2
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:28:59 +0300
Message-ID: <20110616142859.GA18356@redhat.com>
References: <1308153214.7566.6.camel@jaguar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi124@gmail.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	Asias He <asias.hejun@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1308153214.7566.6.camel@jaguar>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:53:34PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> We=E2=80=99re proud to announce the second version of the Native Linu=
x KVM tool! We=E2=80=99re
> now officially aiming for merging to mainline in 3.1.
>=20
> Highlights:
>=20
> - Experimental GUI support using SDL and VNC
>=20
> - SMP support. tools/kvm/ now has a highly scalable, largely lockless=
 driver
>   interface and the individual drivers are using finegrained locks.
>=20
> - TAP-based virtio networking

Wanted to ask for a while: would it make sense to use vhost-net?
Or maybe use that exclusively?
Less hypervisor code to support would help the focus.

--=20
MST