From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Stezenbach Subject: Re: missing compat-ioctl for CDROM_DRIVE_STATUS + FDGETPRM Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:51:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20110629125117.GA5739@sig21.net> References: <20110617090424.GA19345@sig21.net> <201106171502.39445.arnd@arndb.de> <20110629113834.GA4227@sig21.net> <201106291430.43102.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Return-path: Received: from bar.sig21.net ([80.81.252.164]:56868 "EHLO bar.sig21.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753297Ab1F2MvX (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:51:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201106291430.43102.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 29 June 2011, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > Sorry for very slow reply. I think qemu's use of these ioctls > > to probe if the device is a cdrom or floppy is valid, so instead > > of adding a stat() call to check for block device in qemu, I think > > it is better to silence the warning in the kernel. > > Well, correct or not, it will keep causing annoying messages on > old kernels, so why not do both? OK, I'll send a patch for qemu, too. > > Do I get it right that just adding two IGNORE_IOCTL() to > > the ioctl_pointer array in linux/fs/compat_ioctl.c is sufficient, > > like in commit 3f001711? > > Yes. > > > I.e. these ioctls are handled for block devices earlier > > in compat_sys_ioctl()? > > Right. We always first ask the driver, and then search the lookup table > when the driver does not know how to handle it in compat mode. Good, I'll send a patch soon. Thanks, Johannes