From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] A separate thread for the VM migration
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:49:23 -0300
Message-ID: <20110720184923.GA20170@amt.cnet>
References: <2094743550.1446308.1311128624773.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
 <1856940640.1447273.1311134527463.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: Umesh Deshpande <udeshpan@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57491 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751758Ab1GTTDi (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:03:38 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1856940640.1447273.1311134527463.JavaMail.root@zmail01.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Umesh Deshpande wrote:
> This patch creates a separate thread for the guest migration on the target side.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Deshpande <udeshpan@redhat.com>

What for, if its not contending for anything?