From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:24:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20110725112412.GA1429@infradead.org> References: <4E2CA6DE.4040900@web.de> <20110725075305.GA32294@elte.hu> <0EAA5203-D598-4CBA-B8D2-AB371A7689A9@suse.de> <20110725103817.GA21683@infradead.org> <20110725110809.GO28787@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Graf , Pekka Enberg , Jan Kiszka , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com, asias.hejun@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:38749 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751673Ab1GYLYV (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:24:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110725110809.GO28787@elte.hu> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:08:10PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Fact is that developing ABIs within an integrated project is > *amazingly* powerful. You should try it one day, instead of > criticizing it :-) I've been doing this long before you declare it the rosetta stone. Some of the worst ABIs I know come from that kind of development, e.g. all the ioctls we have in xfs, inherited from the "tightly integrated" IRIX development cycle.