From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:09:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20110725120903.GA11952@elte.hu> References: <4E2CA6DE.4040900@web.de> <20110725075305.GA32294@elte.hu> <0EAA5203-D598-4CBA-B8D2-AB371A7689A9@suse.de> <20110725103817.GA21683@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Graf , Pekka Enberg , Jan Kiszka , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com, asias.hejun@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110725103817.GA21683@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:14:13AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > So instead of thinking a bit and trying to realize that there > > might be a reason people don't want all their user space in the > > kernel tree you go ahead and start your own crusade of creating a > > new user space. Great. That's how I always hoped Linux would be > > :(. > > It's not Linux in general yet, it's mostly a crusade of a few with > a political agenda. I find it weird (and insulting) that you are calling our patches that implement better tolling a 'crusade' done under a 'political agenda'. I'd rather say that the extremist position is yours: to keep everything separated always, all the time and ban tools from the kernel repo. You have declared it a failure from the very start and if it were up to you it would never get a fair chance. Thanks, Ingo