public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: "Nadav Har'El" <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dave Allan <dallan@redhat.com>,
	Federico Simoncelli <fsimonce@redhat.com>,
	Abel Gordon <abelg@il.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nVMX: Add KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:36:33 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110923123633.GA30599@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109221052.p8MAquAQ003115@rice.haifa.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:52:56PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> This patch adds a new vcpu->requests bit, KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT.
> This bit requests that when next entering the guest, we should run it only
> for as little as possible, and exit again.
> 
> We use this new option in nested VMX: When L1 launches L2, but L0 wishes L1
> to continue running so it can inject an event to it, we unfortunately cannot
> just pretend to have run L2 for a little while - We must really launch L2,
> otherwise certain one-off vmcs12 parameters (namely, L1 injection into L2)
> will be lost. So the existing code runs L2 in this case.
> But L2 could potentially run for a long time until it exits, and the
> injection into L1 will be delayed. The new KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT allows us
> to request that L2 will be entered, as necessary, but will exit as soon as
> possible after entry.
> 
> Our implementation of this request uses smp_send_reschedule() to send a
> self-IPI, with interrupts disabled. The interrupts remain disabled until the
> guest is entered, and then, after the entry is complete (often including
> processing an injection and jumping to the relevant handler), the physical
> interrupt is noticed and causes an exit.
> 
> On recent Intel processors, we could have achieved the same goal by using
> MTF instead of a self-IPI. Another technique worth considering in the future
> is to use VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT and a highest-priority vector IPI - to
> slightly improve performance by avoiding the useless interrupt handler
> which ends up being called when smp_send_reschedule() is used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c       |   11 +++++++----
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c       |    6 ++++++
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> --- .before/include/linux/kvm_host.h	2011-09-22 13:51:31.000000000 +0300
> +++ .after/include/linux/kvm_host.h	2011-09-22 13:51:31.000000000 +0300
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>  #define KVM_REQ_EVENT             11
>  #define KVM_REQ_APF_HALT          12
>  #define KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE      13
> +#define KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT    14
>  
>  #define KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID	0
>  
> --- .before/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c	2011-09-22 13:51:31.000000000 +0300
> +++ .after/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c	2011-09-22 13:51:31.000000000 +0300
> @@ -5610,6 +5610,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_v
>  	bool nmi_pending;
>  	bool req_int_win = !irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) &&
>  		vcpu->run->request_interrupt_window;
> +	bool req_immediate_exit = 0;
>  
>  	if (vcpu->requests) {
>  		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD, vcpu))
> @@ -5647,6 +5648,8 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_v
>  		}
>  		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_STEAL_UPDATE, vcpu))
>  			record_steal_time(vcpu);
> +		req_immediate_exit =
> +			kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT, vcpu);

The immediate exit information can be lost if entry decides to bail out.

You can do 

        req_immediate_exit = kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT)

after preempt_disable()

and then transfer back the bit in the bail out case in

if (vcpu->mode == EXITING_GUEST_MODE || vcpu->requests
...


  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-23 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-22 10:52 [PATCH 0/2] nVMX injection corrections Nadav Har'El
2011-09-22 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] nVMX: Add KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT Nadav Har'El
2011-09-23 12:36   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2011-09-25  8:13     ` Nadav Har'El
2011-09-26 11:02       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-09-22 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] nVMX: Fix warning-causing idt-vectoring-info behavior Nadav Har'El
2011-09-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 0/2] nVMX injection corrections Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110923123633.GA30599@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=abelg@il.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=dallan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fsimonce@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nyh@il.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox