From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci_cap_init: add 82599 VF quirk Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:59:41 -0300 Message-ID: <20111005195941.GA23690@amt.cnet> References: <1317754938-64699-1-git-send-email-ddutile@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com To: Donald Dutile Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47511 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934378Ab1JEUAZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:00:25 -0400 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p95K0P0P029734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:00:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1317754938-64699-1-git-send-email-ddutile@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 03:02:18PM -0400, Donald Dutile wrote: > v2: Updated to reflect changes requested by reviewers. > > Add check when PCIe capability structure is version 0 > and VID and DID is 82599 VF. In this case, the size > of the PCIe cap structure should be the same as a version 2 > cap structure. > Documented in 82599 Errata 35, and is still marked "No Fix". > According to Intel, it's in silicon not fw, and needs a sw workaround. > > Signed-off-by: Donald Dutile > --- > hw/device-assignment.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Applied, thanks.