From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Fixes for kvm-s390
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:21:46 -0200
Message-ID: <20111019162146.GA8575@amt.cnet>
References: <20111018102711.259185287@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39333 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755403Ab1JSR2M (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:28:12 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111018102711.259185287@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:27:11PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Avi, Marcelo,
> 
> here are 4 fixes for kvm on s390:
> 1. check cpu_id prior to using it
> 2. fix return value of kvm_arch_init_vm
> 3. fix register setting
> 4. implement sigp external call
> 
> All patches have been tested in house and should be ok for the next
> merge windows. Patch 1 fixes a potential index overrun, but stable
> should be the right way to go so late in the release cycle.
> 
> Christian

Applied, thanks.