From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] kvm hypervisor : Add two hypercalls to support pv-ticketlock Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:20:32 +0530 Message-ID: <20111024135032.GB10634@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20111023190307.16364.35381.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <20111023190558.16364.2136.sendpatchset@oc5400248562.ibm.com> <4EA53A7D.300@redhat.com> <20111024122734.GA10634@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4EA56385.9040302@redhat.com> Reply-To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Raghavendra K T , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "H. Peter Anvin" , Gleb Natapov , Virtualization , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , x86@kernel.org, KVM , Dave Jiang , Thomas Gleixner , Stefano Stabellini , Xen , Sedat Dilek , Yinghai Lu , Marcelo Tosatti , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , LKML , Suzuki Poulose , Peter Zijlstra To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EA56385.9040302@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org * Avi Kivity [2011-10-24 15:09:25]: > > I guess with that change, we can also dropthe need for other hypercall > > introduced in this patch (kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op()). Essentially a vcpu sleeping > > because of HLT instruction can be woken up by a IPI issued by vcpu releasing a > > lock. > > Not if interrupts are disabled. Hmm yes ..so we need a kick hypercall then. - vatsa