From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Roedel, Joerg" Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Keep intercepting task switching with NPT enabled Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:55:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20111102095529.GL13244@amd.com> References: <4E9DA7EF.30804@siemens.com> <20111018163516.GO2198@amd.com> <4E9DB95C.1030105@redhat.com> <20111101111335.GD13244@amd.com> <4EAFF6A5.8050308@web.de> <20111101153019.GH13244@amd.com> <4EB01516.2070402@web.de> <20111101161537.GI13244@amd.com> <4EB03900.6000700@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm , Gleb Natapov To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from va3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.12]:40123 "EHLO VA3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751572Ab1KBJze (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 05:55:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB03900.6000700@web.de> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:22:56PM -0400, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-11-01 17:15, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > > No, also a hypervisor that creates the nested page-page on advance falls > > into this category. > > Doesn't this means all guest memory has to be backed with host memory? > That's what I meant with "static". Yes, but isn't Xen working this way? I wouldn't call Xen a simple partitioning hypervisor :) Joerg -- AMD Operating System Research Center Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632