From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: Expose a version 2 architectural PMU to a guests
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:03:58 +0200
Message-ID: <20111102120358.GE14726@redhat.com>
References: <1319993624-20247-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
 <1319993624-20247-3-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
 <4EAFCE36.4070509@redhat.com>
 <20111101123041.GV17571@redhat.com>
 <4EB1150F.3020509@redhat.com>
 <20111102110945.GC14726@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, acme@ghostprotocols.net
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29387 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752969Ab1KBMEN (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:04:13 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111102110945.GC14726@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 01:09:46PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:01:51PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > No.  There is irq_work_queue() for that.  Would be good to avoid it if
> > we know that it's safe to (for example if we have PF_VCPU set).
> > 
> Checking PF_VCPU will not tell us that vcpu is going to reenter guest
> mode again.
> 
Looks like we can check percpu_read(current_vcpu) to see if last vmexit
was due to NMI we are processing and decide according to that.

--
			Gleb.