From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] kvm tools: 64-bit tidy; use PRIx64 when printf'ing
 u64s and link appropriately
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:28:27 +0100
Message-ID: <20111206082827.GA30062@elte.hu>
References: <cover.1323141075.git.matt@ozlabs.org>
 <4EDD8E4D.5000309@ozlabs.org>
 <1323159238.3882.6.camel@lappy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:55383 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932984Ab1LFIaW (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Dec 2011 03:30:22 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1323159238.3882.6.camel@lappy>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>


* Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ingo actually got us to remove all the PRI* specifiers, but 
> that was back when we only did x86 :)
> 
> Ingo, does it make sense to use them now when we support 
> different architectures?

Not at all - ppc should use a sane u64/s64 definition, i.e. 
int-ll64.h instead of the int-l64.h crap.

The powerpc maintainers indicated that they'd fix that, a couple 
of years ago, but nothing appears to have come out of that.

Thanks,

	Ingo