From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] Exporting Guest RAM information for
 NUMA binding
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:55:09 -0200
Message-ID: <20111222175509.GB12744@amt.cnet>
References: <20111108173304.GA14486@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
 <20111121150054.GA3602@in.ibm.com>
 <1321889126.28118.5.camel@twins>
 <20111121160001.GB3602@in.ibm.com>
 <1321894980.28118.16.camel@twins>
 <4ECB0019.7020800@codemonkey.ws>
 <20111123150300.GH8397@redhat.com>
 <1322761231.4699.48.camel@twins>
 <20111222110108.GA7893@amt.cnet>
 <4EF3652B.8080300@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Vaidyanathan S <svaidy@in.ibm.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44298 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755730Ab1LVUQF (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:16:05 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4EF3652B.8080300@codemonkey.ws>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:13:15AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 05:01 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>No virt is crap, it needs to die, its horrid, and any solution aimed
> >>squarely at virt only is shit and not worth considering, that simple.
> >
> >Removing this phrase from context (feel free to object on that basis
> >to the following inquiry), what are your concerns with virtualization
> >itself? Is it the fact that having an unknownable operating system under
> >your feet uncomfortable only, or is there something else? Because virt
> >is green, it saves silicon.
> 
> Oh man, if you say virt solves global warming, I think I'm going to
> have to jump off a bridge to end the madness...

I said it is green (saves energy) and it saves silicon (therefore saves
fuel?). The rest of conclusions are your own.