public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
	avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] KVM: Fix __set_bit() race in mark_page_dirty() during dirty logging
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:11:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120105231123.bfd8b8b7e24d80ba410ccb0c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120105114837.GB1901@amt.cnet>

On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 09:48:37 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:06:43PM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> > It is possible that the __set_bit() in mark_page_dirty() is called
> > simultaneously on the same region of memory, which may result in only
> > one bit being set, because some callers do not take mmu_lock before
> > mark_page_dirty().
> > 
> > This problem is hard to produce because when we reach mark_page_dirty()
> > beginning from, e.g., tdp_page_fault(), mmu_lock is being held during
> > __direct_map():  making kvm-unit-tests' dirty log api test write to two
> > pages concurrently was not useful for this reason.
> > 
> > So we have confirmed that there can actually be race condition by
> > checking if some callers really reach there without holding mmu_lock
> > using spin_is_locked():  probably they were from kvm_write_guest_page().
> > 
> > To fix this race, this patch changes the bit operation to the atomic
> > version:  note that nr_dirty_pages also suffers from the race but we do
> > not need exactly correct numbers for now.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
> > ---
> >  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 7287bf5..a91f980 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -1543,7 +1543,7 @@ void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
> >  	if (memslot && memslot->dirty_bitmap) {
> >  		unsigned long rel_gfn = gfn - memslot->base_gfn;
> >  
> > -		if (!__test_and_set_bit_le(rel_gfn, memslot->dirty_bitmap))
> > +		if (!test_and_set_bit_le(rel_gfn, memslot->dirty_bitmap))
> >  			memslot->nr_dirty_pages++;
> >  	}
> >  }
> 
> Looks good to me.
> 

I was planning to avoid bitmap flip based on srcu by clearing each bit
right before rmap write protection.

for each gfn_offset
	__clear_bit();
	nr_dirty_pages--;
	rmap_write_protect();

This way, I could eliminate memslots allocations and srcu synchronizations
and get dirty log became faster.

Furthermore get dirty log could be called for selected pages without
affecting others.

Now I need to re-think how to achieve the same thing, and measure the effect
again.

	Takuya

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-05 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-04  6:06 [RFC PATCH] KVM: Fix __set_bit() race in mark_page_dirty() during dirty logging Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-01-05 11:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-05 14:11   ` Takuya Yoshikawa [this message]
2012-01-09 12:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120105231123.bfd8b8b7e24d80ba410ccb0c@gmail.com \
    --to=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox