From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] Ucontrol patchset respin without storage keys
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:19:34 -0200
Message-ID: <20120109121934.GA6563@amt.cnet>
References: <20120104092519.060746143@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joachim von Buttlar <joachim_von_buttlar@de.ibm.com>,
	Jens Freimann <jfrei@de.ibm.com>, agraf@suse.de
To: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58035 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754653Ab2AIMaG (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 9 Jan 2012 07:30:06 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120104092519.060746143@de.ibm.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:25:19AM +0100, Carsten Otte wrote:
> Hi Avi,
> 
> after some more discussion about how to do storage keys proper, I could
> not come up with a sane and safe way of doing SSKE without either
> over or underindicating the change bit in corner cases (leads to
> corrupted guest memory or host kernel panic).
> The storage key operations are completely seperate from the rest of
> the ucontrol series:
> - ucontrol VMs can operate without them (handled by hardware)
> - regular VMs can make use of them too (needed for live migration)
> 
> This respin only contains the non-controversial patches. I would
> kindly like to ask for inclusion, I will retry on storage keys as
> soon as I've got a solution.
> 
> so long,
> Carsten

Applied, thanks.