From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM updates for Linux 3.1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:58:30 -0800
Message-ID: <20120112225830.GA3360@kroah.com>
References: <1326364794-18150-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
 <20120112161510.GA11287@kroah.com>
 <4F0F0987.3030500@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:57272 "EHLO
	out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754146Ab2ALXEK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:04:10 -0500
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45])
	by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA10823A31
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F0F0987.3030500@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 06:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:39:50PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > The following patches want to be applied to the 3.1 branch.  "All users must
> > > update".
> >
> > Do any of these also need to go to the 3.0 branch?
> 
> Yes.  But for kvm we regression test stable patches, and I haven't done
> this yet.  I find the normal stable process, while very convenient,
> frightening.

What do you mean by this?

And thanks for the patches, they are all now queued up.

greg k-h