From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: Move gfn_to_memslot() to kvm_host.h
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:02:19 +1100
Message-ID: <20120117050219.GA9170@drongo>
References: <20111220092102.GA5626@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>
 <20120112104115.GA32021@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>
 <20120113060951.GB15875@drongo>
 <E1127F8D-E42E-44C7-B869-2B46C2812C8F@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:37478 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751261Ab2AQF5H (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:57:07 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1127F8D-E42E-44C7-B869-2B46C2812C8F@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 02:30:41PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:

> Which tree is this against? I got this diff between your patch and the patch when applied on my tree:

It's against your tree (previously) plus my first 13-patch series, but
not the second series of 5 patches, which presumably why you got the
difference.  Sounds like you got it applied OK; if not let me know and
I'll rebase against your current tree.

Paul.