From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com,
alan@linux.intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, avi@redhat.com, glommer@redhat.com,
johnstul@us.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org,
kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
amit.shah@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pvclock: Make pv_clock more robust and fixup it if overflow happens
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:48:37 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120213174837.GA11513@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329147959-22472-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Instead of hunting misterious stalls/hungs all over the kernel when
> overflow occurs at pvclock.c:pvclock_get_nsec_offset
>
> u64 delta = native_read_tsc() - shadow->tsc_timestamp;
>
> and introducing hooks when places of unexpected access found, pv_clock
> should be initialized for the calling cpu if overflow condition is detected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Igor,
I disagree. This is fixing the symptom not the root cause. Additionally,
Xen also uses pvclock_clocksource_read.
How about adding a BUG_ON to detect the overflow, this way hunting for
the problem is not necessary.
> arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> index 42eb330..b486756 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c
> @@ -41,9 +41,14 @@ void pvclock_set_flags(u8 flags)
> valid_flags = flags;
> }
>
> -static u64 pvclock_get_nsec_offset(struct pvclock_shadow_time *shadow)
> +static u64 pvclock_get_nsec_offset(struct pvclock_shadow_time *shadow,
> + bool *overflow)
> {
> - u64 delta = native_read_tsc() - shadow->tsc_timestamp;
> + u64 delta;
> + u64 tsc = native_read_tsc();
> + u64 shadow_timestamp = shadow->tsc_timestamp;
> + *overflow = tsc < shadow_timestamp;
> + delta = tsc - shadow_timestamp;
> return pvclock_scale_delta(delta, shadow->tsc_to_nsec_mul,
> shadow->tsc_shift);
> }
> @@ -94,12 +99,19 @@ cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)
> unsigned version;
> cycle_t ret, offset;
> u64 last;
> + bool overflow;
>
> do {
> version = pvclock_get_time_values(&shadow, src);
> barrier();
> - offset = pvclock_get_nsec_offset(&shadow);
> + offset = pvclock_get_nsec_offset(&shadow, &overflow);
> ret = shadow.system_timestamp + offset;
> + if (unlikely(overflow)) {
> + memset(src, 0, sizeof(*src));
> + barrier();
> + x86_cpuinit.early_percpu_clock_init();
> + continue;
> + }
> barrier();
> } while (version != src->version);
>
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-13 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-07 21:05 x86: kvmclock: abstract save/restore sched_clock_state Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-08 10:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-09 12:27 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-09 15:13 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-10 10:02 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-10 10:11 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-10 10:23 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-10 12:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-10 12:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-10 12:43 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-13 12:46 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-13 12:56 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-10 13:18 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-10 20:58 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-13 12:39 ` Amit Shah
2012-02-13 13:07 ` x86: kvmclock: abstract save/restore sched_clock_state (v2) Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-13 15:20 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-13 15:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-02-15 10:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-13 15:45 ` [PATCH RFC] pvclock: Make pv_clock more robust and fixup it if overflow happens Igor Mammedov
2012-02-13 17:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2012-02-13 18:15 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-02-13 16:26 ` x86: kvmclock: abstract save/restore sched_clock_state (v2) Amit Shah
2012-03-01 9:58 ` x86: kvmclock: abstract save/restore sched_clock_state Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120213174837.GA11513@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).