From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: The way of mapping BIOS into the guest's address space Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:38:05 +0400 Message-ID: <20120214153805.GW1878@moon> References: <20120214121342.GE1878@moon> <20120214133256.GI1878@moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yang Bai , Asias He , Ingo Molnar , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:51935 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751180Ab2BNPiM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:38:12 -0500 Received: by bkcjm19 with SMTP id jm19so73947bkc.19 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:38:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 05:35:47PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:20:18PM +0800, Yang Bai wrote: > >> And will seabios replace the present bios implement or co-exsit? > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > > Ideally we should get rid of our minibios completely and only have > > seabios here instead. > > No, no, they should co-exist. There's absolutely no reason to force > people to use a BIOS to boot Linux. > I meant run-time (ie in memory). I didn't mean substitude our minibios, but rather have an ability to either run with compiled-in bios or with seabios instead. Cyrill