From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH uq/master] kvm: Drop unused kvm_pit_in_kernel
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:41:57 +0200
Message-ID: <20120321134157.GT22368@redhat.com>
References: <4F69CB66.8080903@siemens.com>
 <4F69D946.3040800@redhat.com>
 <4F69DA23.8070108@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62556 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757137Ab2CUNmB (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:42:01 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F69DA23.8070108@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:39:47PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-21 14:36, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/21/2012 02:36 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> This is now implied by kvm_irqchip_in_kernel.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > So we can't have -no-kvm-pit?
> > 
> > No huge loss, but unexpected.
> 
> See e81dda195556e72f8cd294998296c1051aab30a8.
> 
I am curious what is the reason for upstream to not supporting disabling the
in-kernel PIT separately?

--
			Gleb.