From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Cure <kvm@cure.nom.fr>
Subject: Re: performance trouble
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:33:57 +0100
Message-ID: <20120322083357.GX12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net>
References: <20120223083807.GA17505@redhat.com> <20120316101331.GM12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <20120319105134.GA27928@redhat.com> <20120320093220.GS12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <20120320094541.GH22368@redhat.com> <20120320111839.GT12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <20120320123821.GL22368@redhat.com> <20120321111001.GV12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <4F6A1056.1020904@dlh.net> <20120322075345.GA22368@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gandalf.cure.nom.fr ([91.121.137.146]:52817 "EHLO
	gandalf.cure.nom.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932191Ab2CVIeB (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:34:01 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120322075345.GA22368@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait :
> 
> All true. I asked to try -hypervisor only to verify where we loose
> performance. Since you get good result with it frequent access to PM
> timer is probably the reason. I do not recommend using -hypervisor for
> production!

	so if I leave cpu as previous (not defined) and only disable
hpet and use 1 vcpu, it's ok for production ?

	Is there a workaround for this PM access ?

	David.