From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Cure Subject: Re: performance trouble Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:35:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20120322083515.GY12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> References: <20120316101331.GM12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <20120319105134.GA27928@redhat.com> <20120320093220.GS12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <20120320094541.GH22368@redhat.com> <20120320111839.GT12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <20120320123821.GL22368@redhat.com> <20120321111001.GV12293@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <4F6A1056.1020904@dlh.net> <20120322075345.GA22368@redhat.com> <4F6ADB54.9050207@dlh.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gleb Natapov , Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Rozenfeld To: Peter Lieven Return-path: Received: from gandalf.cure.nom.fr ([91.121.137.146]:52839 "EHLO gandalf.cure.nom.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756502Ab2CVIfT (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:35:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F6ADB54.9050207@dlh.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: hello, Le Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:57:08AM +0100, Peter Lieven ecrivait : > > @avi, gleb: another option would be to revisit the old in-kernel > pm-timer implementation > and check if its feasible to use this as an alternative. it would also > help non hyper-v aware > systems (i think bsd and old windows like xp). i rebased this old > implementation and can > confirm that it does also solve the performance slow down. Are some patches available for testing ? David.