From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vadim Rozenfeld Subject: Re: performance trouble Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:48:58 +0200 Message-ID: <201203221048.59643.vrozenfe@redhat.com> References: <20120222163356.GE26955@nfs-rbx.ovh.net> <4F6A1056.1020904@dlh.net> <20120322075345.GA22368@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Lieven , David Cure , Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34119 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755998Ab2CVItH (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 04:49:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120322075345.GA22368@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday, March 22, 2012 09:53:45 AM Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 06:31:02PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote: > > On 21.03.2012 12:10, David Cure wrote: > > > hello, > > > > > >Le Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 02:38:22PM +0200, Gleb Natapov ecrivait : > > >>Try to add to cpu > > >>definition in XML and check command line. > > >> > > > ok I try this but I can't use to map the host cpu > > > > > >(my libvirt is 0.9.8) so I use : > > > > > > > > > Opteron_G3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (the physical server use Opteron CPU). > > > > > > The log is here : > > >http://www.roullier.net/Report/report-3.2-vhost-net-1vcpu-cpu.txt.gz > > > > > > And now with only 1 vcpu, the response time is 8.5s, great > > > > > >improvment. We keep this configuration for production : we check the > > >response time when some other users are connected. > > > > please keep in mind, that setting -hypervisor, disabling hpet and > > only one vcpu > > makes windows use tsc as clocksource. you have to make sure, that your vm > > is not switching between physical sockets on your system and that you > > have constant_tsc feature to have a stable tsc between the cores in the > > same socket. its also likely that the vm will crash when live migrated. > > All true. I asked to try -hypervisor only to verify where we loose > performance. Since you get good result with it frequent access to PM > timer is probably the reason. I do not recommend using -hypervisor for > production! > > > @gleb: do you know whats the state of in-kernel hyper-v timers? > > Vadim is working on it. I'll let him answer. It would be nice to have synthetic timers supported. But, at the moment, I'm only researching this feature. > > > peter > > > > > David. > > > > > >-- > > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > > >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > Gleb.