From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/4] uq/master: Basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchip mode Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:06:04 +0300 Message-ID: <20120403130604.GA11053@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46648 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754094Ab2DCNFv (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:05:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > This is v2 of the RFC, fixing a memory leak in > kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes and adding support for the proposed > KVM_SIGNAL_MSI IOCTL. > > This series depends on "kvm: set gsi_bits and max_gsi correctly" > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/88906). Looks good to me. How hard would it be to add irqfd support? > Jan Kiszka (4): > kvm: Refactor KVMState::max_gsi to gsi_count > kvm: Introduce basic MSI support for in-kernel irqchips > KVM: x86: Wire up MSI support for in-kernel irqchip > kvm: Add support for direct MSI injections > > hw/apic.c | 3 + > hw/kvm/apic.c | 33 +++++++++- > hw/pc.c | 5 -- > kvm-all.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > kvm.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.3.4