From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: Avoid zapping unrelated shadows in __kvm_set_memory_region()
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:12:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120414101220.7ddbca6b558e3e60d6612802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F84F64B.4090704@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:11:07 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > restart:
> > - list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, &kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages, link)
> > - if (kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list))
> > - goto restart;
> > + zapped = 0;
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, node, &kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages, link) {
> > + if ((slot >= 0) && !test_bit(slot, sp->slot_bitmap))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + zapped |= kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list);
>
>
> You should "goto restart" here like the origin code, also, "safe" version of
> list_for_each is not needed.
Thank you for looking into this part.
I understand that we can eliminate _safe in the original implementation.
Can you tell me the reason why we should do "goto restart" immediately here?
For performance, or correctness issue?
I thought doing "goto restart" after the list scan would be more efficient.
Takuya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 13:05 [PATCH v2] KVM: Avoid zapping unrelated shadows in __kvm_set_memory_region() Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-11 3:11 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 1:12 ` Takuya Yoshikawa [this message]
2012-04-16 3:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-14 1:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 12:35 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120414101220.7ddbca6b558e3e60d6612802@gmail.com \
--to=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox