From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takuya Yoshikawa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] KVM: MMU: properly assert spte on rmap walking path Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:15:44 +0900 Message-ID: <20120414111544.b3a4b9273fe84ddc33cb7e1c@gmail.com> References: <4F87FA69.5060106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F87FBA5.3060203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM To: Xiao Guangrong Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F87FBA5.3060203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:10:45 +0800 Xiao Guangrong wrote: > static u64 *rmap_get_next(struct rmap_iterator *iter) > { > + u64 *sptep = NULL; > + > if (iter->desc) { > if (iter->pos < PTE_LIST_EXT - 1) { > - u64 *sptep; > - > ++iter->pos; > sptep = iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos]; > if (sptep) > - return sptep; > + goto exit; > } > > iter->desc = iter->desc->more; > @@ -1028,11 +1036,14 @@ static u64 *rmap_get_next(struct rmap_iterator *iter) > if (iter->desc) { > iter->pos = 0; > /* desc->sptes[0] cannot be NULL */ > - return iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos]; > + sptep = iter->desc->sptes[iter->pos]; > + goto exit; > } > } > > - return NULL; > +exit: > + WARN_ON(sptep && !is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)); > + return sptep; > } This will, probably, again force rmap_get_next function-call even with EPT/NPT: CPU cannot skip it by branch prediction. Takuya