From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Introduce a workqueue to deliver PIT timer
 interrupts.
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:27:56 +0300
Message-ID: <20120418082756.GA1020@redhat.com>
References: <20120417103106.GG11918@redhat.com>
 <4F8D4917.5000703@redhat.com>
 <20120417110506.GJ11918@redhat.com>
 <4F8D5B4A.6070904@redhat.com>
 <20120417120340.GL11918@redhat.com>
 <4F8D5CBD.1070004@redhat.com>
 <4F8D9709.3020409@siemens.com>
 <4F8D9787.3000804@redhat.com>
 <20120418080431.GQ11918@redhat.com>
 <4F8E7A89.30503@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27007 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751181Ab2DRI2A (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:28:00 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F8E7A89.30503@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:25:45AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 11:04 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > mainline, are we okay with 254*IPIs?  Maybe it's not so bad and I'm
> > > overinflating the problem.
> > > 
> > Isn't 254*IPIs can also happen if application changes memory mapping?
> >
> 
> It's not in irq context.
> 
Ah, yes. Missed that small detail.

--
			Gleb.