From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE bit
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:39:25 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120420213925.GB13817@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F911BE7.30206@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:18:47PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> This bit indicates whether the spte is allow to be writable that
> means the gpte of this spte is writable and the pfn pointed by
> this spte is writable on host
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index e70ff38..dd984b6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,8 @@ module_param(dbg, bool, 0644);
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include "mmutrace.h"
>
> -#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
> +#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
> +#define SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 1))
>
> #define SHADOW_PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
>
> @@ -1177,9 +1178,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
> new_spte = *sptep & ~PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
> new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
> - new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
> - new_spte &= ~shadow_accessed_mask;
> + new_spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE |
> + shadow_accessed_mask | SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE);
Each bit should have a distinct meaning. Here the host pte is being
write-protected, which means only the SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE bit
should be cleared.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-20 8:16 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: MMU: return bool in __rmap_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 1:10 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 3:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 6:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2012-04-21 3:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 6:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-22 15:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-23 7:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 21:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 0:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 0:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 1:38 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-24 0:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-24 3:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 3:47 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 4:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-21 7:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-24 0:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-20 8:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-20 8:21 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: MMU: document mmu-lock and fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 0:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: MMU: " Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120420213925.GB13817@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox