From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takuya Yoshikawa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:03:12 +0900 Message-ID: <20120421100312.dd3fbb9bd727cc27d7800ccd@gmail.com> References: <4F87FA69.5060106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F87FC19.8080404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120414114422.e3fe6e2abbfdcce61e6f69c8@gmail.com> <4F8B93B9.2030801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120417234731.a19f270d5701b11ce95d13d4@gmail.com> <4F8E915E.2010705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Avi Kivity , Marcelo Tosatti , LKML , KVM To: Xiao Guangrong Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42685 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751375Ab2DUBDR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:03:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F8E915E.2010705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:03:10 +0800 Xiao Guangrong wrote: > By the way, what is the case did you test? ept = 1 ? Yes! I am not worrying about without-EPT/NPT-migration. Takuya