From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 1.1 release?
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:50:49 -0300
Message-ID: <20120613225049.GF19290@amt.cnet>
References: <4FD053C9.6020903@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13585 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754992Ab2FMXX4 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:23:56 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FD053C9.6020903@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:10:01AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Are there any issues with 1.1 release of qemu-kvm?
> 
> The RCs were followed qemu RCs quite closely, but
> the final 1.1 is still not released, anything wrong
> with it?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /mjt

WinXP.32 install is still failing due to floppy bugs, will wait for that
fix to land in qemu-kvm.git.